Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. v. Kishan
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Indian Penal Code, I 860 : S. 304 (Part-/I)-Conviction by trial court-Seven years RI imposed- High Court, by non-speaking order, reducing the sentence to the period already undergone merely on the ground of lapse of time-Held, as the High Court disposed of the matter by an unreasoned order, matter remitted back to it for decision afresh on the question of sentence. Criminal Law : Sentencing- liberal attitude by imposing meager sentence merely for lapse of time would be counter-productive-It is the duty of every court to award proper sentence having regard to the nature of offence and the
Where later benches applied it
- 2015 Tukaram Dnyaneshwar Patil v. State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- 2014 Sushil Ansal v. State through Cbi
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.