Supreme Court of India
Jimmy Jahangir Madan v. Bolly Cariyappa Hindley (d) by Lrs.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.302 read with s.2(q)-Permission to continue prosecution-Death of complainant during trial-Power of attorney holders of the heirs filing applications u/s 302 f1Jr permission to continue prosecution-Held, permission can be granted only if it is sought by the person who is entitled to continue the prosecution and not by the power of attorney holders-Applications dismissed with liberty to the heirs to make applications themselves as indicated in the order-Advocates Act, 1961-s.32-Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881- s.138. In a complaint case under s.138 of the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Chand Devi Daga & Ors. v. Manju K. Humatani & Ors.
- 2013 A.C. Narayanan v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.