Supreme Court of India
V. Raja Kumari v. P. Subharama Naidu and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid, the inevitable conclusion is that the High Court was justified in its view and no interference is called for in this case.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: s.138-Notice by payee--Service of-Notice returned with endorsement that house of addressee was locked-Complaint dismissed for non-service of notice-High Court holding that effect of the endorsement would be considered during trial and complaint could not be dismissed at the threshold-Held, High Court justified in its view. Respondent No. 1 filed a complaint against the appellant for offences under s.138 read with s.142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. It was asserted in the complaint that the legal notice as required under s.138 sent to the
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.