Supreme Court of India
Dharma Prathishthanam v. M/s. Madhok Construction Pvt. Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Arbitration Act, 1940; Ss. 2, 3, 8, 9, 14, 17, 20 and 30: Appointment of an Arbitrator-Requirements of-Award-Validity of- Held: Arbitration refers to private adjudication of disputes referred to Arbitrator/Arbitrators chosen by parties consensually-Jn case, one party does not give consent for appointment of an Arbitrator proposed by the other party, the other party could seek the appointment from the Court--Since the respondent did not follow the correct procedure and methodology by p appointing the arbitrator and referring the disputes unilaterally, Award void ab initio-Limitation Act, 1963;
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2026 Bhadra International (india) Pvt. Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India
- 2006 Chief Engineer of B.p.d.p./r.e.o., Ranchi v. M/s. Scoot Wilson Kirpatrick India Pvt. Ltd.
- 2006 Mcdermott Interntional Inc. v. Burn Standard Co. Ltd. and Ors.
- 2006 M/s. Centrotrade Minerals & Metal Inc. v. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.