Supreme Court of India
Mathakala Krishnaiah v. V. Rajagopal
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908-Section JOO-Second appeal-Disposal of by High Court without formulating substantial question of law-Justification of-Held: It is for the High Court to formulate a substantial question of law and hear the appeal on the question formulated-Jn absence of the same, such judgment cannot be maintained and matter is remitted back to High Court for fresh decision. In these appeals, the issue involved was as to whether the High Court was justified in disposing of the second appeal without formulating the substantial question of law, as mandated by Section 100 CPC.
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2009 Rameshwar Dayal Mangala @ Ramesh Chand v. Harish Chand & Anr.
- 2007 Patrick Jj. Saldanha v. Antony M. Saldanha
- 2007 M/s. Wyawahare & Sons and Ors. v. Madhukar Raghunath Bhave
- 2005 Madan Lal and Anr v. Bal Krishan and Ors.
- 2005 Smt. Ram Sakhi Devi v. Chhatra Devi and Ors.
Of those, 5 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.