Supreme Court of India
Malleshi v. State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860-Section 364A-Abduction of son for getting ransom from father-Ransom demand conveyed to son but not to the father due to arrest of accused-Conviction by Trial Court upheld by High Court-On appeal, Held: Object of abduction was ransom and merely because the demand could not be conveyed to father, that did not take away the offence of accused out of purview of Section 364A-Penal Code, S. 362. Words and phrases- 'Induce', 'deceit', 'ransom', 'demand'-Meaning of in context of Sections 362 and 364A of Penal Code, 1860. According to prosecution, while PW2 was coming out of his
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 Akram Khan v. State of West Bengal
- 2023 Ravi Dhingra v. The State of Haryana
- 2021 Shaik Ahmed v. State of Telangana
- 2015 Vikram Singh@ Vicky &anr. v. Union of India & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.