Supreme Court of India
Anil Kumar Srivastava v. State of U.P. and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons, we do not find any merit in the Civil Appeal No. 5402 of2004, arising out ofSLP (C) No.7790 of2004, as well as in the Transferred Case No. 54 of2004 (Writ Petition No. 10137 of2004 of Allahabad High Court] and the same are accordingly dismissed, with no order as to costs.
Judgment, page 17
From the headnote
Constitution of India, 1950: Public auction-Tenders invited for construction of a commercial land on a plot of land-Bid quoted by one bidder accepted as his b!d was higher than the reserve price-Validity of-Held: An invitation to tender is not an offer-Acceptance of bids/offers is conditional-It is still open to challenge on the ground that the property has not fetched the proper price and that the sale be set aside-On facts, acceptance of highest bid is valid. Public auction-Scheme floated for construction of a commercial hub on a plot for a shopping mall-Writ petition filed before High
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Reddy Veerana v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Others
- 2015 State of Punjab v. M/s. Ban Deep Singh & Ors.
- 2012 Ram Kishun and Ors. v. State of U.P. and Ors.
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.