Supreme Court of India
State of U.P. v. Kishan Chand and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Criminal Trial: Witnesses-Interested witness-Testimony-Reliability of-Held: If the testimony of the interested witness inspires confidence it cannot be discarded. Witnesses-Injured witness-Testimony-Reliability of-Held: The testimony of an injured witness has its own relevance and efficacy-The fact that the witnesses sustained injures at the time and place of occurrence lends support to their testimony that the witnesses were present during the occurrence. Injuries on the accused-Failure to explain-Effect of-At the time of arrest, accused tried toj/ee and in that process sustained some
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 Krishnappa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka by Babaleshwara Police Station
- 2021 Achhar Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.