Supreme Court of India
Sridhar Bhuyan v. State of Orissa
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 : Sections 302, 304 and 300 Exception 4-Murder-Evidence of eyewitnesses-Plea that offence was result of sudden quarrel and without premeditation-Conviction by Courts below for murder-On appeal, conviction altered to Section 304 Part I as the case falls under Exception 4 to Section 300. Section 300 Exception 4-Applicability of-Held: For application of the provision it is not sufficient to show that there was sudden quarrel and there was no premeditation, but must be farther shown that offender did not take undue advantage or acted in cruel and unusual manner. Words and Phrases
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 Manoj Kumar V. State of Himachal Pradesh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2015 Dilip Kumar Mondal & Anr. v. State of West Bengal
- 2018 Gurwinder Singh @ Sonu Etc. v. State of Punjab and Anr.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.