Supreme Court of India
Karnam Ram Narsaiah and Ors. v. State of Andhra Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, we do not find any error or illegality in the conviction of the appellants under Section 302 read with Section.
Judgment, page 4
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 : S. 302 r/w s. 34-0ut of 17 persons prosecuted, 5 convicted by trial court-High Court convicting only three of them-Conviction challenged on the ground that there was no charge against them for offence u/s 302 rlw s.34-Held, there is no error or illegality in conviction of appellants under s.302 rlw s.34-/t is proved that appellants attacked the deceased with a common intention. Malhu Yadav & Ors. v. State of Bihar, (2002) 5 SCC 724, relied on. Ninaji Raoji Boudha & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra, [1976] 2 SCC 117 and Ram Lal v. Delhi Administration, (1973] 3 SCC 466, held
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Thota Sridhar Reddy & Ors. v. Mandala Ramulamma & Ors.
- 2014 Sangili @ Sanganathan v. State of Tamil Nadu
- 2009 Satish & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Of those, 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.