Supreme Court of India
Ajmer Kaur v. State of Punjab and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the application for re-determination filed by Daya Singh under sub-section (5) of Section II of the Act on 21st June, 1985 was liable to be dismissed on the ground of inordinate delay and the Collector was B wrong in re-opening the issue declaring the land as not surplus in the hands of Daya Singh and Kartar Kaur.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Punjab Land Reforms act, 1972; Sections 3(4) and IJ(5) & (7): Filing of return regarding land holding by husband and wife Collector ordered certain land as surplus-Application for re-determination filed by the applicant almost 5 years after the death of his wife-Collector held that applicant was not holding any surplus land-On Review, reversed by the Collector-Revision/Review petitions/writ petition filed by the daughter of the applicant after the death of her father-Dismissed by the revenue authorities and the High Court-On appeal, Held: Application for re-determination ought to have been
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.