Supreme Court of India

Union of India and Ors. v. Krishan Lal Arneja and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2004] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 801
Bench Shivaraj V. Patil and D.M. Dharmadhikari JJ.
Decided 28 April 2004

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

8 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the view that the decisions in Banwari Lal and Shakuntala Gupta cover these appeals against the appellants, we do not consider it necessary to deal with the contention that due to non-compliance G of sub-section (3A) of Section 17 of the Act, the ent!re acquisition proceedings were vitiated.

Judgment, page 33

From the headnote

Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Ss. 4 and 17(1)(4)/Requisitioning and Acquisition of Immovable Property Act, 1953/Defence of India Rules: Acquisition proceedings in respect of certain properties-Issuance of Notification-Challenge to-Quashed by High Court-On appeals, Held: The property/properties could be acquisitioned by the Government on ground of urgency-However, existence of exigency could be ascertained on the basis of surrounding circumstances and available material on record and to the subjective satisfaction of the authorities concerned-While applying urgency clause the State should indeed

Authorities it was built on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.