Supreme Court of India
M/s. Pearlite Liners Pvt. Ltd. v. Manorama Sirsi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the trial court was absolutely right in rejecting the plaint and the lower appellate court rightly affirmed the decision of the trial comt in this behalf.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
r I Specific Relief Act, 1963-Section 14-Contract for personal service- No wrillen contract-Employee challenging transfer order, seeking declaration c that she continued to be in service of employer and injunction restraining company ji'om holding enquiry-Trial Court and also lower appellate court holding suit not maintainable-However, High Court directing suit to be decided on merits-Enforcement of contract-Permissibility of-Held: Enforcement of such contract 1101 permissible under law-Employer cannot be forced to take such employee with whom relation having reached a point of complete loss
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Rajendra Bajoria and Others v. Hemant Kumar Jalan and Others
- 2011 The Divisional Controller, Ksrtc v. M.G. Vittal Rao
Of those, 2 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.