Supreme Court of India

People's Union for Civil Liberties and Anr. v. Union of India

Neutral citation
Reported as [2003] SUPP. 6 S.C.R. 860
Bench S. Rajendra Babu and G.P. Mathur JJ.
Decided 16 December 2003

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

8 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In the result, these petitions stand dismissed subject, however, to the clarifications that we have set out above on the interpretation of the provtsions of the enactment while dealing with the constitutionality F thereof.

Judgment, page 42

From the headnote

Prevention of Terrorist Act, 2002; Sections 4, 18, 19, 20, 21, 27, 30, 32 & 49/Constitution of India 1950; Article 19 and List I & List II to Seventh Schedule/Code of Criminal Procedure, 1974; Section 91: Constitutional validity of provision of POT -Challenge to-Held: POTA has been enacted after taking into consideration well-established legal principles-Mere Possibility of abuse cannot be construed as ground for declaring the Statute unconstitutional. State List-Subjects-Public Order-Terrorism-Held: Terrorism cannot be brought under the Entry 'Public Order' by any stretch of imagination

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.