Supreme Court of India
Surendra Paswan v. State of Jharkhand
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Criminal Trial: Eye witnesses had seen bullet fired by the accused on the deceased Later on, a bullet was found embodied in the dead body of the deceased- Bullet not sent for chemical examination-Whether fatal to the prosecution case-Held, no-When the evidence given by the eyewitnesses are credible, cogent and trustworthy, merely because the bullet was not sent for ballistic examination, it would not outweigh the testimonial worth of the eyewitness. Minor injuries on the body of the accused in the same occurrence- Medical evidence not brought before the court-Whether fatal-No-It is not an
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 Sheo Shankar Singh v. State of Jharkhand & Anr.
- 2009 State of M.P. v. Dhara Singh & Anr.
- 2008 Ram Pyare Mishra v. Prem Shanker and Ors.
- 2008 Gunnana Pentayya @ Pentadu & Ors. v. State of A.P.
- 2007 State of U.P. v. Atar Singh and Ors.
- 2007 Shahjajhan and Ors. v. State of Kerala and Anr.
- 2004 Anil Kumar v. State of U.P.
Of those, 7 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.