Supreme Court of India
M.T.W. Tenzing Namgyal and Ors. v. Motilal Lakhotia and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that no case has been made out for our interference with the judgment and decree under appeal.
Judgment, page 15
From the headnote
land laws: Plaintiffe claiming title over suit land through their predecessor-in interest-Case based on title and not possession-Allegation that property acquired by Sikkim Government and consequently by Government of India- Trial Court allowing the suit-High Court setting aside the same-Justification of-Held, since plaintiffe failed to prove that land belonged to them and records of right are not basis of determination of title as they are mainly based on possession, order of High Court justified-Constitution of India, Article 371 . Plaintifrs predecessor-in-interest owned certain plots of
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Vijay Madanlal Choudhary & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2019 Shree Shree Ram Janki Ji Asthan Tapovan Mandir & Anr. v. The State of Jharkhand & Ors.
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.