Supreme Court of India
Babu Lal and Ors. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Practice and procedure-Judgment by appellate courts-Held, elaborate and detailed analysis not required but only sufficient reasons for concurrence are required in concurring judgment whereas elaborate and detailed analysis and reasoned conclusions are imperative in a judgement of reversal. Criminal Trial: Appreciation of evidence-Eye-witnesses-Whether partison witnesses- Held, relationship cannot wipe out credibility of evidence-If evidence found credible after careful analysis, it can form basis of conviction-On the facts, held, evidence of eye-witnesses credible-Penal Code, 1860-Sections
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 State of Maharashtra v. Nisar Ramzan Sayyed
- 2013 Jose S/o Edassery Thomas v. State of Kerala
- 2013 Hiraman v. State of Maharashtra
- 2015 Vijaypal v. State (gnct) of Delhi
Of those, 3 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.