Supreme Court of India
Sushil Kumar v. Rakesh Kumar
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Constitution of India-Article I73(b)-Minimum age-Importance of-Nomination of a candidate objected to on the ground of his being under-aged-Duty of returning officer-Mandatory duty of the returning officer to make inquiry in respect of all objections raised-Election of an under-aged candidate-Validity of-Held, election would be void even though the nomination paper had been accepted-Representation of the People Act-Section 36 (2). Indian Evidence Act, I872-Section I06-Burden of proof-Facts especially within knowledge-Burden is on the person who has such knowledge-Election petition-Age of a
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 M/s. Gian Chand & Brothers and Another v. Rattan Lal @ Rattan Singh
- 2012 Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin & Anr.
- 2022 Mohd. Abdullah Azam Khan v. Nawab Kazim Ali Khan
- 2019 M/s Natesan Agencies (plantations) v. State Rep. by the Secretary to Government Environment and Forests Department
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.