Supreme Court of India
Union of India v. Paul Manickam and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Constitution of India, 1950: Article 22 (5)-Preventive detention- Representation made to President of India instead of authorities mentioned in the detention order- Habeas Corpus petition filed concealing correct facts about the representation-High Court dismissed petition-Review Petition filed mentioning for first time that representation was actually made to the President-Review Petition allowed quashing the detention order due to inordinate delay in considering the representation-On Appeal Held, compliance of all requirements and safeguards mandatory even if detention is for a brief
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 G. Reddeiah v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.
- 2023 Kaushal Kishor v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- 2021 Vinod Dua v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2019 Union of India through Joint Secretary (cofeposa), Ministry of Finance, New Delhi v. Ankit Ashok Jalan
- 2019 Union of India 2. Joint Secretary (cofeposa), Govt. of India, Ministry of Finance v. Dimple Happy Dhakad
- 2012 Huidrom Konungjao Singh v. State of Manipur & Ors.
- 2012 Subramanian v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 distinguished · 5 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.