Supreme Court of India
M. Prabhulal v. The Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons, the impugned judgment of the High Court D cannot be faulted.
Judgment, page 15
From the headnote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Sections 8(c), 8(1), 18, 21, 29 & 67: Conviction based on statements made under Section 67 before Officers of Department-Allegation of torture and harassment in obtaining the statement making it involuntary- Delay in recording the statement put forth as one of the reasons to show that statement was involuntary-Accused making no complaint of torture before the Magistrate-Vague stand of torture taken before Trial Judge under Section 313 Cr.P. .-ln such circumstances, the confessional statement was voluntary-Also, accused failed to establish
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 Madhu @ Madhuranatha & Anr. v. State of Karnataka
- 2013 Gian Chand & Ors. v. State of Haryana
- 2013 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi, Bombay
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.