Supreme Court of India
Union of India v. M/s V. Pundarikakshudu and Sons and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the impugned judgment does not suffer from any legal infirmity.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Arbitration Act, 1940-Sections JO-Misconduct-Meaning of-One part of the award inconsistent with the other part of the award-Held, amounts to legal misconduct-Award can be set aside. Arbitration Act, 1940-Sections JO-Award-Setting aside of-Non application of mind by the arbitrator-Effect of-Arbitrator holding that a party is responsible for delay in execution of the contract-Still awarding award in favour of the defaulting party-Non-application of mind by the arbitrator-Award can be set aside. Arbitration Act, 1940-Sections JO-Award-Challenge to--Arbitrator awarding claims of both parties
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2009 Harbans Singh & Ors. v. Sant Hari Singh & Ors.
- 2003 M.D., Army Welfare Housing Organisation v. Sumangal Services Pvt. Ltd.
Of those, 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.