Supreme Court of India
Union Territory of Chandigarh and Ors. v. Rajesh Kumar Basandhi and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that no interference is called for in the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
SERVICE LAW: Punjab Civil Services Rules, 1989-Rule 7A-Union-Territory of Chandigarh Employees (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1992-Recruitment Maximum Age Limit-Notification for recruitment of Assistant District Attorney/Law Officer issued by appellant under the Rules of 1992 fixing maximum age limit as 30 years-Notification challenged contending that the maximum age limit is 35 years under the Punjab Rules in view of amendment in 1996-Challenge upheld by Tribunal-On appeal, held, the amended Punjab Rules are ipso facto applicable to the conditions of service under the provisions of the 1992
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.