Supreme Court of India
Sohan Lal Gupta (dead) Thr. Lrs. and Ors. v. Smt Asha Devi Gupta and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that at this stage, he cannot be permitted to change his advocate, particularly in view of the fact that he stuck to his earlier stand for several years.
Judgment, page 23
From the headnote
Arbitration Act, 1940 Arbitration proceedings-Reasonable opportunity-Held, every party entitled to reasonable opportunity-However, party does not have unfettered right-Arbitrator has a right of managing the hearing and giving directions in pursuance thereof-Direction to remain present on particular date, time and place would be sufficient compliance of the requirement of law-Party has no absolute right to insist on being consulted-Matter within the discretion of arbitrator and court will intervene only in the event of positive abuse-Party alleging violation of principles of natural justice
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Rajeev Suri v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors
- 2020 M/s. Centrotrade Minerals and Metals Inc. v. Hindustan Copper Ltd.
- 2020 Vijay Karia & Ors. v. Prysmian Cavi E Sistemi Srl & Ors.
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.