Supreme Court of India
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. M/s. Annapurna Constructions
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that unless the error of law sought to be pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioners in the instant case is patent on the face of the award, neither the High Court nor this Court can interfere with the award.
Judgment, page 15
From the headnote
Arbitration Act, 1940; Ss. 14, 15, 16, 29 and 30: Contract of construction-Arbitration clause-Disputes-Arbitrator made award with interest thereon inf avour of contractor-Court while making award a rule did not grant interest-Appeal of the company and application for interest of the contractor dismissed by the trial Court-Appeal dismissed but application for interest allowed by the High Court-Held: Since interest was not allowed by the trial Court in terms of provision of law, High Court could not grant the same in exercise of its revisional power. Jurisdiction of the Arbitrator:
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Psa Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd. v. The Board of Trustees of V.O. Chidambranar Port Trust Tuticorin and Others
- 2011 Durga Charan Rautray v. State of Orissa & Anr.
- 2023 Union of India & Ors. v. M/s. Bharat Enterprise
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.