Supreme Court of India
Madan Lal and Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
9 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985: Section 42-Compliance of-Plea that no proof that information regarding transportation of narcotic drugs transmitted to superior authority- Held: On facts, material establishing that information sent without delay to superior officer-Thus provision of Section 42(2) complied with. Section 50-Scope and applicability of-Held: Section 50 is applicable in case of personal search of person and not search of vehicle or container or bag or premises. Section 20-Possession of narcotic drug-Plea that sample sent for analysis varied in weight and
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Union of India through Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow v. Md. Nawaz Khan
- 2013 Gian Chand & Ors. v. State of Haryana
- 2013 Ram Swaroop v. State (govt. Nct) of Delhi
- 2013 Kashmiri Lal v. State of Haryana
- 2010 Dehal Singh v. State of Himachal Pradesh
- 2025 Rakesh Kumar Raghuvanshi v. The State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2024 Smt. Najmunisha v. The State of Gujarat
- 2020 Jeet Ram v. The Narcotics Control Bureau, Chandigarh
- 2015 Kulwinder Singh &anr. v. State of Punjab
Of those, 5 relied on · 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.