Supreme Court of India
State of Karnataka v. M.V. Manjunathegowda and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860--Sections 302, 201 and 3048-Dowry death-Death within 7 years of marriage-Cruelty to deceased soon before the incident Prosecution witnesses contradictory-Evidence of sole witness not corroborated by the circumstances of the case-Conviction by trial Court u!ss. 302 and 20/-Acqui//al by High Court-On appeal-Held, acquillal u!s 302 justified since in the facts of the case prosecution case not proved beyond reasonable . '· doubt-Demand and payment of dowry proved-Accused liable to be punished 1i/s 304 -In the facts and circumstances of the case deterrent punishment is called
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Hari Om v. State of Haryana & Another
- 2007 Rameshwar Dass v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- 2006 Ram Badan Sharma v. State of Bihar
- 2005 Satbir Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.