Supreme Court of India
State through Special Cell, New Delhi v. Navjot Sandhu @ Afshan Guru and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Constitution of India, I950; Articles 226 and 227/Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973; SS.397 and 482 /Prevention of Terrorism Act,2002; S.34: Accused filed applications objecting use of 'intercepted conversation' as an evidence to prove charges under POTA-Dismissed by the Trial Court Appeals/Petitions under Sec.34 of POTAIS.482 Cr.P. ./Art.227 Constitution of India-Reversed by the High Court-Power of High Court to interfere with Interlocutory Order/Orders of the Courts below-Held: Since no appeal lies against an interlocutory order under POTA, by entertaining an appeal High Court deprived
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2024 Anees v. The State Govt. of Nct
- 2020 Mohd. Inam v. Sanjay Kumar Singhal & Ors.
- 2018 Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.v. Central Bureau of Investigation v. Central Bureau of Investigation
- 2024 Ravishankar Tandon v. State of Chhattisgarh
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.