Supreme Court of India
Rizan and Another v. State of Chhatisgarh, through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Chhatisgarh, Raipur, Chhatisgarh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
6 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, J 860: Ss. 32 3 and 326-Conviction under by courts below rejecting plea of private defence by accused-On appeal, held-In the facts of the case plea of private defence not proved-Hence conviction justified. Sections 96, 97, 98, JOO and JOI-Right to private defence-Proof of Held, in order to find availability of private defence the injuries received by the accused, the imminence of threat to his safety, the injuries caused by him and the circumstances whether the accused had time to have recourse to public authorities are relevant factors to be considered-Exercise of private
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Ex. Ct. Mahadev v. The Director General, Boarder Security Force & Ors.
- 2019 Rohtas & Anr. v. The State of Haryana
- 2014 Sheesh Ram and Ors. v. The State of Rajasthan
- 2022 Uttam v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2018 Rupinder Singh Sandhu v. State of Punjab & Others
- 2012 Anand Mohan v. State of Bihar
Of those, 3 relied on · 2 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.