Supreme Court of India
Seth Chand Ratan v. Pandit Durga Prasad (d) by Lrs. and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that a writ petition ought not to have been entertained by the High Court when the respondent had already chosen the remedy under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
MP. Public Trust Act, 1951-Sections 4, 5, 7, 8, 26(2) and 27- Application for registration of a temple as public trust-later withdrawn ard the temple declared as private property-Second application by another person for registration of temple as different public trust-Temple declared as such later, records amended showing the lemple as private property-Application before Regislra1jor proper management of the trusl properly-Registrar m~e reference u!s 26(2) to Court for adjudication of validity of order amending the records-Amendment of Records held not valid by the Court-Appeal against
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 M/s Radha Krishan Industries v. State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors.
- 2019 Satish Ukey v. Devendra Gangadharrao Fadnavis and Anr.
Of those, 2 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.