Supreme Court of India
Jamal Uddin Ahmad v. Abu Saleh Najmuddin and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Election Law: Representation of People Act, 1951-Sections 80, BOA, 81, 86 and 16! - Constitution of India, 1950-Articles 329, 214 and 216-Election Petition- Presentation of before Stamp Reporter-Validity of-High Court Rules authorising such presentation-No law by Central Government or Parliament regarding the presentation-Held: Presentation of the petition to High Court would mean delivery of the petition to High Court through its .authorized officer-High Court having been conferred with the substantive jurisdiction to hear and try an election petition, it is competent to make provision for
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 M/s Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Large Tax Payer Unit - Ii
- 2014 Sidhartha Sarawgi v. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkataand Others
- 2017 Bank of New York Mellon London Branch v. Zenith Infotech Limited
- 2012 The State of Maharashtra & Ors. Etc.etc. v. Saeed Sohail Sheikh Etc. Etc.
Of those, 2 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.