Supreme Court of India
Charan Lal Sahu v. Dr. Apj Abdul Kalam and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons stated above, we do not find any merit either in the Election petition or in the special leave petition against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi and dismiss them with costs which are assessed on Rs. 25,000 in each case.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
l S leave petition against the judgment of the High Court. Costs assessed at Rs. 25,000 imposed in each case. The costs so deposited shall be transferred to the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee. No petition filed by the petitioner-in-person shall be entertained in this Court till the amount of costs imposed is deposited. (26- ) Charan Lal Sahu v. K.R. Narayanan and Ors., (1998[ I SCC 56, referred to. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION : Election Petition No. I of 2002. (Under Article 71(1) and 131(1) of,the Constitution of India.) WITH SLP( ) No. 22385/2002. In-person for the Petitioner The Judgment
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.