Supreme Court of India

Killick Nixon Ltd., Mumbai v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2002] SUPP. 4 S.C.R. 348
Bench Ruma Pal and B.N. Srikrishna JJ.
Decided 25 November 2002

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In the result, we allow the appeal, set aside the judgrnent of the High c Court and quash the notices under Section 142 (1) of the Act dated 16.8.1999 and 30.12.1999 read with letters dated 16.8.1999, 30.12.1999 and 15.2.2000.

Judgment, page 11

From the headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961: Sections 142(1), 143, 90 and 91--Assessee filing return-Assessing Officer disallowing certain claims-Appellate Authority upholding order of Assessing Officer in respect of certain items but setting aside the order with regard to four heads and remitting the matter to assessing authority-Assessing Officer giving effect to the appellate order, determining the assessed income and raising demand-Meanwhile assessee filing declaration under Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme-Tax arrears determined and paid-Designated authority issuing final certificate-Assessing Officer re-opening

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.