Supreme Court of India
Jaipal v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Evidence Act, 1872-Circums/anlia/ evidence-Murder-Husband charged with murder of wife by administering poison-Conviction based on circumstanlial evidence-Appreciation of-Held, there were fatal omissions by the police in not protecting !he place of incident as well as samples of vomit, thereby depriving valuable and clinching evidence-Merely because of foul smell from !he mouth of the deceased, a case of poisoning could not be concluded-In the facts and circumslances of the case, ii is not safe to draw an inference !hat accused had administered poison lo the deceased wife.
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 Rajbir Singh v. The State of Punjab
- 2024 Darshan Singh v. State of Punjab
- 2020 Sandeep Kumar and Others v. State of Uttarakhand and Another
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.