Supreme Court of India
S. Shanmugavel Nadar v. State of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Doctrine of merger: Decision of lower court-Merger of in the decision of superior court- Scope and extent of -Appeals against judgment of Division Bench of High Court in M. Varadaraja Pillai's case• upholding constitutional validity of provisions of State Act No. 13 of 1960 dismissed by Supreme Court on I 0. 9.1986 for non-joinder of State, as a party-Prayer for impleadment refused on the ground that it was made after a long lapse of time -In a later case another Division Bench of the High Court felt that the decision in M. Varadaraja Pil/ai's case required re-consideration and referred the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Vishu Vardhan @ Vishnu Pradhan v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
- 2022 The State of Haryana through Secretary to Government of Haryana v. Jai Singh & Ors.
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.