Supreme Court of India
Kanhaiya Lal Agrawal v. Union of India
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, we allow these appeals by setting aside the orders made by the High Court both by the Division Bench and the learned Single Judge and dismiss the writ petition.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
Government Contracts-Supply of material-Invitation of tenders-One of the tenderers offering tender with rebate-Acceptance of such tender Whether illegal or arbitrary-Held, since such an offer was made at the time of submission of tender and such an offer was given as an additional inducement to accept the offer expeditiously the acceptance thereof is not illegal or arbitrary. In these appeals, the question that arose for consideration was whether the tender offered by the appellant-tenderer with the rebate could have been accepted and whether such acceptance would affect the interests of any
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Tata Motors Limited v. The Brihan Mumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (best) and Others
- 2013 Rashmi Metaliks Ltd. & Anr. v. Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority & Ors.
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.