Supreme Court of India
The Mor Modern Co-operative Transport Society Ltd. v. Financial Commissioner and Secretary to Govt. Haryana and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered view that the fact that the Transport Commissioner has no personal financial interest in the State undertaking, is of no consequence.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988-Section 68(2): Employee of State Transport Authority-Whether having financial interest-Held, yes-Financial interest of an employee may not be direct However it includes the financial interest which he may have as an employee c of the Undertaking. Notification appointing employee of Transport Authority as Chairman/ Member of Regional Transport Authority-Validity of-Held, the words employed in Section 68(2) are of wide amplitude and expressly include an employee of an Undertaking-Proviso to Section 68(2) debars such appointment since he is an employee-Hence
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Renu & Ors. v. District & Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari & Anr.
- 2018 State of Gujarat & Ors. v. Utility Users’ Welfare Association & Ors.
- 2018 Bharati Reddy v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.
- 2013 Central Electricity Supply Utility of Odisha v. Dhobei Sahoo & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.