Supreme Court of India
State of Haryana v. State of Punjab and Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered opinion that those submissions are of no consequence and there could not be any fetter on the power of this Court to issue appropriate directions.
Judgment, page 41
From the headnote
Inter State Water Disputes Act, 1956/Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966- r Sections 2(c), 1 I/Section 78-Bifurcation of erstwhile State of Punjab into two Stales, Punjab and Haryana, in 1966-Notification in March 1976 by c the Government of India allocating water to the plaintiff-State after an agreement with the State of Punjab-Haryana State unable to draw its allocated share of water through the existing Bhakra Main Line Canal- Proposal by the Haryana State for the construction of a new canal called Sutlej-Yamuna Link Canal (SYL Canal) for full drawing of its allocated water-Agreement entered
Where later benches applied it
- 2011 State of Himachal Pradesh v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2016 State of Karnataka v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors.
- 2011 Itc Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.