Supreme Court of India
Sanju @ Sanja Y Singh Sengar v. State of M.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
7 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860-Sections 306 and 107-Abetment of suicide-On facts, strained relation between parties-Quarrel between the parties where appellant allegedly using abusive language and telling the deceased to go and die-Deceased coming home in an inebriated condition day after quarrel and next day found hanging-Also left a suicide note a reading of which shows deceased not a man with sound mind and sense-Appellant charge-sheeted Whether appellant abetted commission of such suicide-Held, no since suicide not direct result of quarrel-Further to say 'to go and die', itself does not constitute
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 State of West Bengal v. Indrajit Kundu & Ors.
- 2025 Patel Babubhai Manohardas & Ors. v. State of Gujarat
- 2024 Prakash and Others v. The State of Maharashtra and Another
- 2022 V. P. Singh Etc v. The State of Punjab & Ors.
- 2019 Gurjit Singh v. State of Punjab
- 2026 Balaji Jaiswal v. State of Chhattisgarh
- 2012 Praveen Pradhan v. State of Uttranchal & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 distinguished · 4 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.