Supreme Court of India
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation v. Ashrufulla Khan and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons, the judgments and order including State Transport Appellate Tribunal under appeal are set aside.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939: Chapter IVA-Sections 68C, 68D-State carriage route permit-Grant of-Scheme totally excluding private operators from plying on notified route Existing operators whose permits overlap the notified portions to be rendered ineffective for the overlapping portions-When private operators traverse on the lines of notified route to continue journey on a non-notified route-Such traversing on a notified route cannot be regarded as intersection-Also such overlapping cannot be sustained as it relates to small portion or portions falling within the limits of a town or a village
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 Kerala State Road Transport Corporation v. Baby P. P. & Ors.
- 2014 B.A. Linga Reddy Etc. Etc. v. Karnatakastate Transport Authority & Ors.
- 2012 State of Bihar & Anr. v. Arvind Kumar & Anr.
Of those, 3 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.