Supreme Court of India
Commissioner, Central Excise, Nagpur v. M/s. Wainganga Sahkari S. Karkhana Ltd.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Excise Laws: Trusses, Columns and purlines-Making of-Whether amounts to manufacture-Held, Tribunql noted that it had been found as a fact by the Collector that assessee had undertaken fabrication work at site-Decision of Aruna Industries case applied to instant case-Tribunal's order cannot be faulted Aruna Industries Vishakhapatnam v. . . . Guntur, (1986) 25 ELT 580, relied on. Structurals and Machineries (Bokaro) Pvt. Ltd v. Collector of Central Excise, (1984) (17) ELT_ 127 and Richardson and Cruddas, (1972) Ltd. v. Collector of Central Excise, (1988) 38 ELT 176, referred to. CIVIL APPELLATE
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.