Supreme Court of India
Rajesh @ Raju Chandulal Gandhi and Anr. v. State of Gujarat
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the plea of ante-timing of the FIR is the figment of imagination of the defence and not a reality.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Indian Penal Code, I860: Sections I20B, and 302 c Murder_:_ Testimony of eye witnesses-Cogent reliable and confidence inspiring-Concurrent findings of Court below as to guilt of accused- Conviction held justified-Held, no interference called for with impugned judgment on facts FIR was not ante-timed-Non-mentioning of FIR No. and name of eye witnesses in Inquest Panchanama insignificant-Withholding of report of finger print expert facts not relevant. The appellants were prosecuted under Sections 120B, 452 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and also under Section 25(l)(b) of the Arms Act
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.