Supreme Court of India
Sri Shibu Chandra Dhar v. Sri Pasupati Nath Auddya
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956: Section 13, Section 17 (2A) and (2B) and 17A to J7D (As inserted by Amendment Act 30 of 1969)-Interpretation of Tenancy Laws-Rent-Deposit not made within time-Application not made for extention of time within the prescribed period-Power and discretion c of Court to extend time-Held, intention of Legislature was to give benefit to tenant-Court has power to extend time-Held, the word 'shall' used in Section I 7 (2B) means 'may '-Held, Act is a beneficial legislation-Should be construed liberally so tha~ purpose is fulfilled. Tenants-One of the tenants
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Bijay Kumar Singh & Others v. Amit Kumar Chamariya & Anr.
- 2007 Binapani Paul v. Pratima Ghosh and Ors.
- 2005 Gaya Prasad Kar v. Subrata Kumar Banerjee
- 2003 Nasiruddin and Ors. v. Sita Ram Agarwal
Of those, 1 referred to · 3 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.