Supreme Court of India
Daya Singh v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Indian Penal Code, 1860-Sections 302 & 307-Terrorists and Disruptive Activities Act. 1987-Sections 3 & 5-Conviction under Sustainability of-Identification of the appel/a111 by two eye-witnesses during trial Failure of other eye-witnesses to identifo the appellant-Corroboration of the evidence of independent witness by the evidence of eye-witness-No lapse on the part of the investigating officer in holding test identification parade-Held, conviction sustainable. Criminal Trial-Test identification-Purpose of Is to have, corroboration to the evidence of the eyewitnesses in the form of earlier
Where later benches applied it
- 2012 Deepak @ Wireless v. State of Maharashtra
- 2012 Subhash Krishnan v. State of Goa
- 2010 Siddanki Ram Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh
- 2019 Raja v. State by the Inspector of Police
- 2016 Somasundaram @ Somu v. State Rep. by Dy. Comm. of Police
Of those, 3 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.