Supreme Court of India
Dr. Vijay Laxmi Sadho v. Jagdish
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Before parting with this aspect of the case, we wish to recall what was opined in Mahadeolal Kanodia v.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
Election laws: Representation of the People Act, 1951: Section 83 and 86-Election-Election petition-Maintainability of Corrupt practice-Affidavit in support of-Not drawn -up in prescribedform Dismissal of petition in limine on this ground-Permissibility of-Held: Defect c in affidavit is a curable one-Hence, petition not liable to be dismissed in limine-Any consequences arising from such 'defective' affidavit have to be judged at the trial of the election petition-But S.86(/) not attracted to such a case. Madhya Pradesh High Court rules: Rule 2(b). Election petition-Drawn-up in Hindi
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2013 G.L. Batra v. State of Haryana and Others
- 2012 Ponnala Lakshmalah v. Kommuri Pratap Reddy & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.