Supreme Court of India
Union of India and Ors. v. M. Aslam and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered opinion that the status of the F employees in the Unit-Run Canteens must be held to be that of a government employee and consequently the Central Administrative Tribunal would have the jurisdiction to entertain applications by such employees under the provisions of Administrative Tribunal Act.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Ce/1/ral Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985: Section 14-Administrative Tribunal-Jurisdiction-Unit-run canteens--Employees of-Whether Government employees-Held: Government is obliged to provide canteen facilities to troops at unit level- Ojficers of Defence Services have all pervasive control over Unit-run - ~ canteens-Regular set of Rules is fi"amed and funding of articles is provided by Canteen Stores Department-Hence, employees of Unit-run canteens are Government employees-Therefore, Administrative Tribunals have jurisdiction to entertain and decide their applications and
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 Union of India and Others v. Dyalu Ram
- 2013 Balwant Rai Saluja & Anr. Etc. Etc. v. Air India Ltd. & Ors.
Of those, 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.