Supreme Court of India

State of A.P. and Ors. v. N. Audikesava Reddy and Ors.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2001] SUPP. 5 S.C.R. 162
Bench S.B. Bharucha, Y.K. Sabharwal and Brijesh Kumar JJ.
Decided 6 November 2001

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the master plan prepared as per law in force even subsequent to enforcement of the Act is to be taken into consideration to determine whether a particular piece of land is vacant land or not and, to this extent, Atia Begum is not correctly decided.

Judgment, page 10

From the headnote

c Urban Development and Town Planning : Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulations) Act, 1976-Vacant land-Jn excess of ceiling limit-Quantification of-Master plan-Applicability of-Held: Master plan prepared even subsequent to enforcement of the Act is to be taken into consideration for determination of vacant land. Words and Phrases: "Master plan"-Meaning of-In the context of S. 2(h) of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulations) Act, 1976. "Commencement of the Act"-Meaning of-In the context of S.6(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulations) Act, 1976. In this appeal the following question-arose before

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to · 1 explained

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.