Supreme Court of India
Harshad S. Mehta and Ors. v. The State of Maharashtra
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
9 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons, we are of the opinion that the learned Special Court rightly rejected the application of the appellants for revocation of the order of pardon.
Judgment, page 40
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Macquarie Bank Limited v. Shilpi Cable Technologies Ltd.
- 2013 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon v. The State of Maharashtra, through Cbi, Bombay
- 2011 Bangaru Laxman v. State (through Cbi) & Another
- 2011 M/s. Sharma Transports v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
- 2024 Union of India & Ors. v. Rajeev Bansal
- 2023 A. Srinivasulu v. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police
- 2015 Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust v. Magnum Developers and Others
- 2014 R. N. Agarwal v. R. C. Bansal & Ors.
- 2014 P.C. Mishra v. State (c.b.i.) & Anr.
Of those, 4 relied on · 4 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.