Supreme Court of India

M/s. Aspinwall and Co. Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Income-tax, Ernakulam.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2001] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 559
Bench S.P. Bharucha, Y.K. Sabharwal and Ashok Bhan JJ.
Decided 5 September 2001

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that the High Court was wrong in its opinion that the processing of the raw berries into coffee beans ready for consumption would not be a manufacturing activity disentitling the assessee to the investment allowance provided under Section 32A of the Act.

Judgment, page 7

From the headnote

Income Tax Act, 1961: Section 32-/nvestment Allowance-Machinery installed for curing coffee-Assessee claiming investment allowance-Whether entitled-Held, processing of raw berry into coffee beans amounts to manufacturing activity-­ Assessee entitled to investment allowance under Section 32A--Section 256. Words & Phrases- 'Manufacture '-Meaning of in common parlance. Appellant-assessee had claimed investment allowance under Section 32A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for machinery installed for curing of coffee in its coffee curing plants, for the assessment years 1980-81 and 1983-84 which was

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.