Supreme Court of India
Shambhu Ram Yada V v. Hanuman Das Khatry
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Advocates Act, 1961 : Section 35-Misconduct-Advocate wrote a letter to his client demanding Rs. 10,000 for bribing the Presiding Judge to obtain orders in his favour- State Bar Council suspended the Advocate from practice for a period of two years-But the Bar Council of India directed removal of the Advocate from the roll of Advocates-On review Bar Council of India reduced the punishment to one of reprimand-Justification of-Held: The Advocate is guilty of serious misconduct-Hence, punishment of permanent debarment rightly imposed- Reduction in punishment-Not justified Section 44-Review of
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.