Supreme Court of India
P.K. Pradhan v. State of Sikkim Represented by the Central Bureau
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 197. Public servant-Prosecution of-Sanction-Requirement of-Held: There has to be a reasonable connection between the act complained of and the discharge of official duty-If there is no such reasonable connection no sanction is required-Question of sanction can be raised any time after cognizance, at the time of conclusion of trial or even after conviction-The question of sanction may be left open to be decided in the main judgment- . Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, Ss. 5(2) and 5(/)(d)-Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Ss. 13(2) and 13(/)(d).
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 Station House Officer, Cbi/acb/bangalore v. B.A. Srinivasan and Anr.
- 2024 Directorate of Enforcement v. Bibhu Prasad Acharya, Etc.
- 2024 Fuleshwar Gope v. Union of India & Ors.
- 2016 Surinderjit Singh Mand & Anr. v. State of Punjab & Anr.
- 2015 Sonu Gupta v. Deepak Gupta & Ors.
Of those, 1 relied on · 4 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.